It made everything that little bit better than far cry 3, more streamlined and stuff. And then primal and 5 and new dawn did it even more so. So I think that it's not so much that it's overrated, it's just that maybe the people that keep going on and on about amazing it is, haven't played it again since they first completed it. One of Far Cry 5's biggest weaknesses was how Joseph Seed disappeared for much of the game, leaving the work to his siblings. Hopefully, that won't happen here. I am the reinforcements. Far Cry 100%. I’ve played both and Valhalla is undoubtedly the worst of the two it’s mind-numbingly boring and has a story that’s far too long than it needs to be FC6 is way better, it has the best weapon customisation in the franchise alongside its great world and story even if it does have a relatively anticlimactic ending. This shoulda been for Primal. I know it’d be silly to make a Primal DLC so many years later. This whole thing felt lazy for Far Cry 6 but I feel like if it was for Primal then the juxtaposition of the high tech high intelligence alien entity with Takar and the primitive world of Primal would be a more interesting pairing. Every Far Cry game likely has its fans, but some are definitely better than others. So, with the recent release of Far Cry 6 , it seemed like a perfect time to revisit every Far Cry game and rank An old guy’s thoughts on Far Cry 5 vs. 6. I gather that guys my age (early 40s) often don’t have as high expectations as the younger crowd when it comes to games. When you remember the height of video game tech being an 8 bit ethnic stereotype stomping on pixelated mushrooms and turtles, even the most half assed far cry game is fucking amazing. The biggest difference between Far Cry 6 and my much beloved Far Cry 5 is the story. While Far Cry 5’s player character was a nameless, mute person only referred to as “Rook,” Far Cry 6 bj9g.

is far cry 6 better than far cry 5